History & Civics
Chapter 16
Board Weightage: 8 Marks in Class 9 Exams
Civics: Directive Principles of State Policy
Prescribed Textbook: Total History & Civics (Class 9) - Morning Star
Canonical Link:
https://icse.smartindia.pro/class9_history_and_civics_civics_directive_principles_of_state_policy.html
Prerendered HTML Page: class9_history_and_civics_civics_directive_principles_of_state_policy.html
📖 Syllabus Scope & Overview
Part IV of Constitution (Articles 36-51), classification (Socialist, Gandhian, Liberal/Intellectual, International peace), non-justiciable nature, difference between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles, and welfare state concept.
🔑 Mandatory ICSE Examiner Technical Keywords with Detailed Description
Official CISCE Evaluation Benchmark
According to CISCE board marking schemes, evaluators allocate marks based on the explicit presence of mandatory technical keywords. General or colloquial explanations fail to secure full marks. The table below details every required technical term, its scientific/academic description, the evaluator directive, and its exact model answer usage.
Mandatory Keyword #1
Core Definition
Chapter Concept: Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights
1-2 Marks in Structured Board Question
"Non-justiciable guidelines"
📘 Technical Definition & Detailed Description:
In ICSE Class 9 History & Civics (Civics: Directive Principles of State Policy), "Non-justiciable guidelines" denotes a constitutional clause, statutory provision, diplomatic treaty, or historic landmark event.
CISCE history examiners require exact constitutional articles, formal treaty names, and precise historical dates. Incorporating "Non-justiciable guidelines" guarantees factual accuracy.
📝 Model Answer Application (Exact Phrasing for Board Exam):
"Under the historical context of Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights, the implementation of "Non-justiciable guidelines" established the requisite legal/political framework."
Mandatory Keyword #2
Core Definition
Chapter Concept: Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights
1-2 Marks in Structured Board Question
"Establish Welfare State"
📘 Technical Definition & Detailed Description:
In ICSE Class 9 History & Civics (Civics: Directive Principles of State Policy), "Establish Welfare State" denotes a constitutional clause, statutory provision, diplomatic treaty, or historic landmark event.
CISCE history examiners require exact constitutional articles, formal treaty names, and precise historical dates. Incorporating "Establish Welfare State" guarantees factual accuracy.
📝 Model Answer Application (Exact Phrasing for Board Exam):
"Under the historical context of Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights, the implementation of "Establish Welfare State" established the requisite legal/political framework."
Mandatory Keyword #3
Core Definition
Chapter Concept: Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights
1-2 Marks in Structured Board Question
"Social and economic democracy"
📘 Technical Definition & Detailed Description:
In ICSE Class 9 History & Civics (Civics: Directive Principles of State Policy), "Social and economic democracy" denotes a constitutional clause, statutory provision, diplomatic treaty, or historic landmark event.
CISCE history examiners require exact constitutional articles, formal treaty names, and precise historical dates. Incorporating "Social and economic democracy" guarantees factual accuracy.
📝 Model Answer Application (Exact Phrasing for Board Exam):
"Under the historical context of Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights, the implementation of "Social and economic democracy" established the requisite legal/political framework."
Mandatory Keyword #4
Core Definition
Chapter Concept: Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights
1-2 Marks in Structured Board Question
"Borrowed from Irish Constitution"
📘 Technical Definition & Detailed Description:
In ICSE Class 9 History & Civics (Civics: Directive Principles of State Policy), "Borrowed from Irish Constitution" denotes a constitutional clause, statutory provision, diplomatic treaty, or historic landmark event.
CISCE history examiners require exact constitutional articles, formal treaty names, and precise historical dates. Incorporating "Borrowed from Irish Constitution" guarantees factual accuracy.
📝 Model Answer Application (Exact Phrasing for Board Exam):
"Under the historical context of Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights, the implementation of "Borrowed from Irish Constitution" established the requisite legal/political framework."
Complete step-by-step evaluator solutions for textbook problems and 5 generated practice sets adhering to CISCE marking schemes.
📘 Textbook Problem: Textbook Exercise 16 - Structured Essay Q.3
Total History & Civics (Class 9) - Morning Star - Structured Questions
4 Marks Total
With reference to Civics: Directive Principles of State Policy, discuss the historical significance of Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights. State two major causes and two lasting consequences.
Step-by-Step Marking Breakdown
Step 1: Context and Historical Background: Introduce the historical period, key personalities, and context of Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights.
1 Mark
Step 2: Two Principal Causes: Detail two distinct socio-political, economic, or constitutional factors that precipitated this historical event or reform.
2 Marks
Step 3: Impact and Constitutional/Historical Significance: Summarize the enduring outcome on governance, societal transformation, or national development.
1 Mark
Final Answer: Comprehensive 4-point structured answer covering background, causes, and historical impact
(Units: Historical Dates / Constitutional Articles)
💡 Examiner Tip: Present answers in numbered bullet points rather than dense paragraphs to facilitate quick marking by the evaluator.
🎯 Generated Set: Generated Practice Set 1 - Core Concept (2 Marks)
ICSE Class 9 Exam Blueprint - Chapter 16
2 Marks Total
Define "Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights" in the context of ICSE Class 9 History & Civics. State its primary characteristic or SI unit/standard symbol.
Step-by-Step Marking Breakdown
Step 1: Precise Technical Definition: Fundamental Rights are justifiable (enforceable in court under Article 32/226), negative injunctions on the State, and secure political democracy. Directive Principles are non-just...
1 Mark
Step 2: Mandatory Technical Criteria: Ensure the definition contains mandatory keywords: Non-justiciable guidelines, Establish Welfare State, Social and economic democracy.
1 Mark
Final Answer: Accurate scientific/scholarly definition containing all mandatory ICSE evaluation keywords.
(Units: Theoretical definition)
💡 Examiner Tip: Avoid colloquial explanations. Use the exact technical definition given in prescribed CISCE curriculum.
🎯 Generated Set: Generated Practice Set 2 - Method & Application (3 Marks)
ICSE Question Bank & Specimen Framework - History & Civics
3 Marks Total
Explain the procedural method or practical demonstration used to verify "Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights". State the working apparatus/setup and key precautions.
Step-by-Step Marking Breakdown
Step 1: State the Formula / Conceptual Principle: State the fundamental principle governing Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights.
1 Mark
Step 2: Mathematical / Procedural Deduction: Describe the experimental procedure with step-by-step observational recording.
1 Mark
Step 3: Concluding Result & Interpretation: Express the final outcome clearly with proper units or scientific deduction.
1 Mark
Final Answer: Verified procedural conclusion for Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights
(Units: Procedural steps)
💡 Examiner Tip: In derivation and numerical questions, every intermediate mathematical step carries fractional credit.
🎯 Generated Set: Generated Practice Set 3 - Comparative Analysis (3 Marks)
ICSE Exemplar Practice Paper - History & Civics
3 Marks Total
Differentiate between "Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights" and "Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights" on the basis of: (i) Fundamental definition/mechanism, (ii) Key working condition or formula, (iii) Real-world practical example or application.
Step-by-Step Marking Breakdown
Point 1: Conceptual Difference: Contrast the primary mechanisms: Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights focuses on Non-justiciable guidelines, whereas Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights emphasizes Non-justiciable guidelines.
1 Mark
Point 2: Quantitative / Operational Difference: Highlight differences in formulas, governing laws, operating environments, or physical behavior.
1 Mark
Point 3: Exemplary Differentiation: Provide one clear, unambiguous textbook example illustrating each concept under everyday conditions.
1 Mark
Final Answer: Three-point structured comparative table with clear opposing criteria.
(Units: Tabular points)
💡 Examiner Tip: Always construct a comparative answer in a two-column table with an explicit "Point of Difference" header column.
🎯 Generated Set: Generated Practice Set 4 - Board Standard Structured (4 Marks)
ICSE Board Marking Blueprint - Class 9
4 Marks Total
A comprehensive ICSE examination question based on "Civics: Directive Principles of State Policy":
(i) State the fundamental law or rule governing "Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights". [1 Mark]
(ii) How does this concept change with temperature / pressure / time / scale? [1 Mark]
(iii) State one common mistake students make in this chapter and provide the correct scientific reasoning. [2 Marks]
Step-by-Step Marking Breakdown
Part (i): Statement of the Law: State the formal principle verbatim as recognized by CISCE syllabus committees.
1 Mark
Part (ii): Dependency Analysis: Explain the direct or inverse variation of the target variable with respect to environmental or operational factors.
1 Mark
Part (iii): Error Analysis & Correct Resolution: Identify the frequent pitfall: Students often confuse Non-justiciable guidelines with related quantities. The correct understanding requires strict application of Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights.
2 Marks
Final Answer: Structured 4-mark solution completely addressing parts (i), (ii), and (iii).
(Units: Multi-part breakdown)
💡 Examiner Tip: Notice the mark distribution in multi-part questions; allocate your answering time and detail strictly in proportion to allotted marks.
🎯 Generated Set: Generated Practice Set 5 - Higher Order Thinking (HOTS) (4 Marks)
ICSE High-Achiever Challenge Series - Class 9
4 Marks Total
A critical scenario-based problem in "Civics: Directive Principles of State Policy": An experiment is performed under non-ideal conditions involving "Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights" and "Directive Principles vs Fundamental Rights".
(a) Predict what happens to the expected outcome if the boundary condition fails.
(b) Give complete scientific justification.
(c) State the critical safeguard or correction formula to rectify the error.
Step-by-Step Marking Breakdown
Part (a): Prediction of Anomalous Outcome: Accurately predict the deviation from theoretical expectations when standard assumptions are violated.
1 Mark
Part (b): Scientific Justification: Provide a rigorous scientific explanation using first principles and mandatory keywords: Non-justiciable guidelines, Establish Welfare State, Social and economic democracy, Borrowed from Irish Constitution.
2 Marks
Part (c): Correction Protocol & Mathematical Remedy: State the exact rectification formula or procedural calibration necessary to restore accuracy.
1 Mark
Final Answer: Full scenario analysis with anomaly prediction, first-principles justification, and correction method.
(Units: HOTS Analytical Reasoning)
💡 Examiner Tip: HOTS questions in ICSE evaluate depth of conceptual understanding. Avoid superficial guessing; reason backward from core laws.